Friday, November 03, 2006
Appeals Court Overturns Blind Chinese Activist's Guilty VerdictHONG KONG, Oct. 31, 2006--An appeals court in the eastern Chinese province of Shandong has overturned the guilty verdict again rights activist Chen Guangcheng, sending the case back to the county-level court for a retrial, Radio Free Asia reports.
"I got a call this afternoon from the Yinan county court telling me that the Intermediate People's Court in Linyi had reached a decision regarding Chen Guangcheng's case and that that decision had already been delivered to the Yinan court for them to implement," Chen's lawyer Li Jingsong told RFA's Mandarin service.
Chen, a social activist who blew the whistle on official abuses under China's one-child policy, was sentenced by the Yinan County People's Court on Aug. 24 to four years and three months' imprisonment for "willfully damaging property and organizing a mob to disturb traffic."
Lawyers and relatives called the trial an illegal and retaliatory move by local officials angry at Chen's damning expose of their actions.
"The decision did two things," Li said. "One was to overturn the guilty verdict against Chen handed down by the Yinan County Court. The second was to require that the Yinan court carry out a retrial."
"For them to do that means that the original decision was completely in error and illegal. We can be sure of this. The original verdict has no effect any more. It is obsolete," Li said.
"And an appeals court will never order a retrial lightly, without a very good reason, especially not in a case that has the sort of international impact that this one has."
"From the point of view of the defense, this is the best possible result," Li said.
Chen's wife Yuan Weijing welcomed the news.
"When I heard the news I was very happy because at the very least it means that Chen will get another opportunity to speak on his own behalf. And it shows that there was a problem with the initial verdict."
But she said she doubted the retrial would be conducted fairly.
"Even now I am under surveillance," Yuan said. "And I'm not sure about the strongest witnesses for the defense; whether they will come out and testify. Especially the ones who had forced confessions wrung out of them. I am afraid that they have been too intimidated to come out and speak."
Chen's groundbreaking work as a self-trained legal advocate on behalf of women suffering forced abortions and other abuses at the hands of Yinan county family planning officials has earned him praise among socially aware netizens in China.
But it has also drawn him years of house arrest, surveillance, beatings, and harassment by local officials and the unidentified men they hire as heavies.
Li said the Linyi Intermediate People's Court's decision wasn't just a victory for Chen Guangcheng, but also for all those struggling for civil rights and the rule of law in China.
"It's a victory for all those people who are continuing to fight to protect the rule of law and their rights in the face of persecution by corrupt officials."
The New York-based Human Rights in China said in a recent report that China's legal system was being undermined by continual pressures on lawyers, especially those representing clients in sensitive cases involving allegations of official wrongdoing.
Original reporting in Mandarin by Ding Xiao. RFA Mandarin service director: Jennifer Chou. Translated and written for the Web in English by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Sarah Jackson-Han.
RFA is a private, nonprofit corporation that broadcasts news and information in nine Asian languages to listeners who lack access to full and free news media. The purpose of RFA is to provide a forum for a variety of opinions and voices from within these Asian countries. Strict adherence to the highest standards of journalism is at the very core of RFA's mission. Our Web site adds a global dimension to this objective. RFA is funded by an annual grant from the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG).
If you are not a subscriber and wish to receive mailings from Radio FreeAsia, please send a blank email to: firstname.lastname@example.org.